Robot coding workforce Introduction

As we tread deeper into the automation era, chatbots like ChatGPT have become indispensable assets for a multitude of tasks, including coding for actuarial and data science. With an ability to understand context, display creativity, and solve problems, these tools offer unparalleled advantages. This article outlines a unique architectural approach using multiple versions of the GPT models, such as GPT-4 and GPT-3.5, in tandem with other chatbots, to collaboratively handle, review, and execute coding tasks.

The Power of Diversity

Before diving into the architecture, it’s worth highlighting the advantage of having a diverse chatbot workforce. While ChatGPT models are versatile and potent, incorporating external models like Google’s Bard brings a fresh perspective and possibly a different approach to problem-solving. Just as a diverse human workforce brings varied strengths, insights, and expertise, a mixed bot team can ensure a more robust and comprehensive coding process.

The Framework

1. The ChatGPT Manager (GPT-4 Model):
The linchpin of our structure, the Manager acts as a liaison between the human and the bot ensemble. Its key responsibilities include:
– Parsing the high-level task from the user.
– Segmenting this task into actionable chunks.
– Delegating these chunks to Workers.
– Assigning review duties to the Reviewer.
– Overseeing the amalgamation of the final code to meet the end goal.

2. The Workers (GPT-3.5 Models and External Chatbots):
These are the foot soldiers, which can include ChatGPT models or external chatbots like Google’s BERT. Each Worker:
– Commences its task following a specific pattern, ensuring the code is distinguishable from the explanatory text.
– Drafts, compiles, and tests code in real-time.
– Reports its progress to the Reviewer.

3. The Reviewer (GPT-4 Model):
Serving as a seasoned developer overseeing junior devs (the Workers), the Reviewer:
– Receives a brief from the Manager detailing expectations and outcomes.
– Offers insights, corrections, and optimization tips for the Workers’ code.
– Operates its own compiler environment for code testing and verification.
– Assures that the aggregated code aligns with the target outcome.

The Process

1. Task Delegation: The Manager breaks down a user-given coding task, dispatching sub-tasks to Workers.
2. Coding Phase: Workers, with their varied strengths and specialities, begin coding.
3. Review & Feedback: Workers submit their drafts to the Reviewer, undergoing several iterations till the Reviewer is content.
4. Compilation & Testing: With access to compilers, all entities can validate their code in real time.
5. Final Consolidation: Once the Reviewer greenlights the code’s quality, it sends it to the Manager for final assembly.
6. Notification: The human user is updated once the task concludes, receiving the consolidated code.


1. Efficiency: Multiple bots ensure swift task completion.
2. Precision: An inherent review process guarantees optimized, error-free code.
3. Flexibility: Can manage both basic and intricate coding assignments.
4. Server Integration: The framework can synchronize with diverse server-side platforms, notably NodeJS and Python, expanding its potential.

Investing in the Future

Introducing such a diversified bot architecture may seem capital-heavy initially. However, it’s vital to perceive it through an investment lens. Though upfront costs can be substantial, the long-term yields in terms of efficiency, precision, and labour savings are invaluable.


Integrating various chatbot models, like ChatGPT and Google’s BERT, to automate coding tasks symbolizes a transformative phase in software development. This multi-bot strategy guarantees speed, proficiency, and precision. In our evolving digital epoch, it seems “Many bots make efficient code.”